rewrite this title XRP Ledger just flipped Solana in RWA tokenization value and the holder count reveals why

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) has overtaken Solana on one closely watched metric over the past month, flipping it in real-world asset tokenization, excluding stablecoins.

Data from RWA.xyz indicate that the Ledger has approximately $1.756 billion in total on-chain real-world asset value, excluding stablecoins, compared with approximately $1.682 billion for Solana.

While this gap is not large, the shift is notable because it reflects a sudden burst of issuance-style activity on a network that has spent much of the last cycle in the shadow of faster, retail-heavy chains.

The speed of the move is the bigger surprise. RWA.xyz shows the XRPL’s represented asset value at about $1.45 billion, up 276.75% over the last 30 days.

Over the same 30-day window, RWA.xyz shows Solana’s distributed asset value up 43.34%, Ethereum’s distributed assets up 16.58%, and Polygon’s distributed assets up 22.48%.

Those numbers do not say the XRPL has become the busiest tokenization venue in crypto.

However, they point out that XRPL captures a form of tokenization that institutions often adopt first: high-value assets recorded on-chain in controlled structures that resemble regulated market plumbing more than open, retail distribution.

Represented versus distributed, and why the split matters

RWA.xyz divides tokenized assets into two categories, distributed assets and represented assets.

Distributed assets are built to move. They can be transferred peer-to-peer and moved to external wallets, which aligns more closely with how crypto markets typically define token activity: broad ownership, high transfer counts, and visible secondary flows.

On the other hand, represented assets are recorded on-chain but are not freely transferable outside the issuer or platform’s participant set.

In this model, the chain functions more like a shared ledger for recordkeeping and reconciliation, with restrictions, participant gating, and operational controls.

That distinction helps explain how XRPL can lead in value while remaining quiet by crypto standards.

The growth on XRPL is overwhelmingly in represented assets. This is the version of tokenization that can scale quickly in notional value because it does not require a large retail holder base or deep on-chain turnover to be recognized as “on-chain value.”

It can also appear, from the outside, as a network that has suddenly grown in “RWA TVL” without showing a comparable increase in the activity metrics typically tracked by traders.

A value flip built on concentration, not throughput

The same dataset that shows the XRP Ledger ahead of Solana on total real-world asset value also shows how concentrated the XRP Ledger’s footprint appears to be.

RWA.xyz reports the XRP Ledger with 22 real-world asset holders and a 30-day transfer volume of approximately $10.11 million, down by about 91% over 30 days.

That profile fits a market with a handful of large on-chain issuances held in controlled structures, rather than widely distributed, actively traded tokens moving across many wallets.

Solana’s profile is different. RWA.xyz reports approximately $1.64 billion in distributed asset value on Solana, up 43.34% over 30 days; approximately 285,007 real-world asset holders, up 114.81%; and approximately $2.18 billion in 30-day transfer volume, up 36.92%.

Put together, the contrast is sharp as XRPL is winning on value concentration while Solana is winning on participation and throughput.

Essentially, this suggests the market is currently rewarding tokenization that can accumulate significant value under tight controls, even when the assets are not yet widely moving across wallets.

That is a familiar pattern in early institutional adoption. Firms often begin by recording assets in a ledger for lifecycle management and reconciliation. They expand distribution and secondary transfer later, once the compliance model and operating procedures have been proven.

Why institutions are leaning into XRPL right now

XRPL’s represented asset surge aligns with the design choices the network has emphasized for institutional users: controls first, venues later.

Institutions that tokenize assets early often want the on-chain system to resemble existing market infrastructure. That means controlled access, restricted transfers, and clear operational boundaries.

It reduces friction by allowing issuers to mirror compliance and participant rules that already exist off-chain, rather than rebuilding everything in a fully permissionless environment.

XRPL has been pushing to make that control layer native. PermissionedDomains is enabled, providing issuers with an on-chain mechanism to restrict participation via credential-gated access controls.

That matters because it transforms “permissioning” from a business-process promise into a protocol-level feature, one that can be incorporated into the structure of assets and venues.

The next step is the market-venue layer. PermissionedDEX is intended for a trading environment restricted to approved participants rather than open to the public.

That is the direction institutions tend to pursue once assets are represented on-chain, a controlled environment where they can trade, settle, and manage lifecycle events within defined access rules.

MPTokensV1 is also enabled, adding token primitives intended to address common issuance requirements.

It is the sort of feature that tends to matter more to issuers than to traders, because it speaks to how assets are created and managed rather than how quickly they can be moved between retail wallets.

Taken together, the feature set supports an institutional sequence, represents assets on-chain under rules that resemble familiar transfer restrictions, then expands into controlled trading as permissioned market infrastructure matures.

That sequencing also helps explain why XRPL can show large represented value with a small holder base. The early objective is governed issuance, not mass distribution.

Notably, recent issuer activity fits that pattern on the blockchain network.

On Feb. 11, Aviva Investors announced a partnership with Ripple to tokenize traditional fund structures on the XRPL.

The market significance of this move is that a regulated asset manager’s entry into the tokenized fund infrastructure can broaden the set of credible issuers building on a blockchain.

Nigel Khakoo, Ripple’s Vice President of Trading and Markets, said:

“With [XRPL] built-in compliance tools, near-instant settlement, and native liquidity, the [blockchain] provides the secure and scalable infrastructure required to support the next generation of institutional assets.”

This followed the $280 million diamond tokenization initiative in the United Arab Emirates, implemented through a partnership between Ctrl Alt, a Ripple-backed custody technology provider, and Billiton Diamond.

What to watch next

The headline is that the XRP Ledger has surpassed Solana in real-world asset value tokenized on-chain, and it has done so with the fastest growth rate shown in the represented-asset measure.

In light of this, the next phase for the network concerns whether that value constitutes an active market.

A base case is that XRPL continues to onboard a small number of large represented issuances.

If the represented value is approximately $1.45 billion and the distributed value grows only modestly, XRPL can remain competitive in value-based rankings even if it remains a smaller story in crypto-native activity terms.

Meanwhile, a potential upside is that the market structure stack matures, with permissioned trading and lending amendments moving to active use, and institutions beginning to treat tokenized assets as collateral.

If that happens, it should be reflected not only in value but also in transfer volume and participation, as controlled markets become more than a ledger entry.

A downside case is that the recent jump proves to be a one-off concentration.

If assets remain largely non-transferable and transfer volume stays depressed, the flip can look more like accounting dominance than market dominance, while Solana continues to compound participation and liquidity through distributed assets.