rewrite this title In-Kind Redemptions in Crypto ETPs: Will They Improve Security or Add Complexity?

The SEC’s July 2025 announcement allowing in‑kind creation and redemption for spot Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange‑traded products (ETPs) marks a major shift in how crypto ETFs operate and sets a new direction for evolving ETP policy in digital asset markets. 

This change matters deeply for the crypto ETP market. It reduces operational friction, cuts down taxable events, and helps keep ETF prices aligned with their underlying assets, making these products more attractive for institutional investors and market makers. With issuers like BlackRock, ARK 21Shares, Fidelity, and others moving quickly to adopt in‑kind mechanisms, ETP policy is evolving to better suit the demands of institutional players and improve overall market efficiency.

In this article, we’ll break down what this rule shift means, from the benefits and trade-offs to market impacts and industry sentiment. We’ll explore whether in‑kind redemptions genuinely enhance security and efficiency or if they introduce new layers of complexity that could trip up both issuers and investors.

What In-Kind Redemptions Mean

When investors redeem shares of a crypto ETP, they can now receive Bitcoin or Ethereum directly, rather than cash, a practice known as in-kind redemption. This is a big change from the previous cash-only model, where funds had to liquidate holdings and return fiat, often resulting in delays and market impact.

In traditional ETFs, like those backed by stocks or commodities, in‑kind redemptions are the norm. Authorized participants (typically institutional traders) exchange large “creation units” of ETF shares for the underlying assets, maintaining tax efficiency and ensuring tight alignment between share price and net asset value (NAV). This mechanism supports arbitrage activity that keeps ETF prices in sync with their holdings.

Applying this model to crypto ETPs brings both unique benefits and challenges. On one hand, it reduces settlement friction, lowers taxable events, and improves price tracking for institutional players. On the other hand, crypto assets pose storage, custody, and valuation complexities, particularly in areas such as volatile pricing, secure key storage, and managing Bitcoin or Ether delivery versus payment in cash. These factors introduce operational risks and demand technical infrastructure that differs from traditional ETF models. 

Benefits for Liquidity and Security

Allowing direct exchange of ETF shares for Bitcoin or Ethereum brings meaningful improvements in liquidity, pricing accuracy, and institutional suitability.        

Minimizes slippage and price impact

In traditional cash redemptions, ETF providers must sell crypto on the open market to raise cash, which can create large price swings, especially in less liquid conditions. With in-kind redemptions, issuers simply transfer crypto directly to authorized participants. 

This removes the need to execute large trades, preventing slippage and minimizing sudden price impact, especially during high-redemption periods or volatile markets. 

Reduces tax consequences for ETF holders

One of the key advantages of in-kind redemptions is that they are not considered taxable sales at the fund level. Instead, crypto is moved directly from the ETF to the redeemer. This allows the ETF to avoid generating capital gains that would otherwise be passed on to shareholders. 

For long-term investors, this structure helps reduce taxable events and enhances the tax efficiency of holding crypto ETPs, much like gold and equity ETFs.

Better alignment with institutional trading practices

Institutions are already accustomed to asset-for-asset trades in traditional markets. In-kind redemptions mimic this structure, enabling seamless transfers between ETF providers and institutional trading desks. 

This makes crypto ETPs more appealing to market makers, hedge funds, and arbitrage desks, as they align with their internal trading systems and reduce the need to deal with fiat off-ramps or crypto exchanges.

Tighter bid-ask spreads and reduced tracking error

In-kind redemptions enable more efficient arbitrage, where authorized participants create or redeem ETF shares to keep prices close to the net asset value. This tightens the bid-ask spread and ensures that the ETF’s price stays in line with the underlying crypto asset. 

With less slippage and more efficient price discovery, retail and institutional investors benefit from improved trading performance and lower implicit costs.

Streamlined operational flow and lower costs

Managing large cash redemptions in volatile crypto markets can be slow and costly due to network fees, fiat conversion delays, and compliance hurdles. In-kind transfers bypass much of this complexity. 

Issuers can send crypto directly from custodial wallets to institutional wallets, reducing the number of steps involved and lowering operational risks and costs. This efficiency can also improve ETF performance by minimizing overhead.

Enhanced resilience in volatile markets

During market sell-offs, ETFs with cash redemption structures may be forced to sell assets at inopportune times, potentially worsening downturns. In-kind redemptions avoid this by allowing ETF shares to be swapped for crypto without liquidating holdings. 

This makes the ETF more resilient during volatility and avoids sudden drawdowns caused by forced sales. It also gives large holders more flexibility in managing their positions without harming overall market liquidity.

Added Complexity for Issuers and Custodians

While in-kind redemptions bring efficiency and security benefits, they also introduce added layers of complexity for crypto ETF providers and custodians. 

Challenges of handling crypto custody across multiple assets

Issuers must securely manage a wide range of digital assets, often across different blockchains with varying technical standards, wallet requirements, and security protocols.

This fragmentation increases the risk of operational errors and demands advanced custody solutions that can scale securely and reliably. Maintaining security across all these systems also requires constant monitoring and updates to address evolving threats and technology changes.

Risks of settlement delays or on-chain transfer issues

Unlike traditional markets, on-chain transactions can face unexpected delays due to network congestion, high gas fees, or protocol-level bugs.

These issues can disrupt the redemption process, cause timing mismatches, and negatively impact investor confidence. Even slight delays during volatile market periods could result in material pricing discrepancies or arbitrage opportunities.

Infrastructure demands and operational overhead for issuers

To process in-kind redemptions, ETF providers must invest in blockchain infrastructure, compliance systems, and skilled personnel to ensure seamless operations. This increases cost and complexity, especially when managing multiple assets and maintaining real-time reconciliation.

Smaller issuers may struggle to compete unless they outsource key operations or partner with crypto-native service providers.

Compliance and regulatory coordination across jurisdictions

Crypto asset transfers often involve varying legal requirements depending on the asset type and region. Issuers and custodians must navigate a patchwork of regulations, which increases legal risk and administrative burdens, particularly in cross-border redemptions.

Lack of regulatory harmonization can delay approvals or force issuers to restructure redemption procedures based on investor location. 

Greater exposure to smart contract and custodial risks

Smart contracts and third-party custodians may introduce vulnerabilities that don’t exist in traditional finance. A flaw or exploit in the redemption pathway could lead to misallocation of funds, loss of assets, or reputational damage for the ETF provider. 

Continuous audits, risk assessments, and multi-layered security frameworks are crucial for managing these risks at scale. 

Does It Improve Investor Protection?

In-kind redemptions in crypto ETPs raise critical questions about investor protection, particularly around transparency, cost fairness, and security. Advocates argue that these redemptions enhance transparency by facilitating direct transfers of crypto assets, thereby eliminating the need for fiat conversions or opaque pricing mechanisms. 

This method minimizes hidden fees and limits potential price manipulation by intermediaries, helping ensure that all investors receive fair value. It also allows transactions to be verified on-chain, reinforcing trust and aligning with the decentralized nature of crypto.

However, this approach comes with trade-offs. It shifts the technical and security burden to ETF custodians, who must safely manage multiple wallets and private keys. If those keys are lost, mishandled, or hacked, investors could suffer significant losses. Such incidents could damage confidence in the ETF, and investors would bear the brunt of those failures, raising questions about whether the current safeguards are strong enough.

While in-kind redemptions may mitigate some systemic risks associated with fiat redemptions and third-party exposures, they also introduce new risks, such as smart contract bugs, blockchain outages, or asset mismatches across different chains. These risks are harder to predict and require specialized oversight. 

So while in-kind redemptions do offer some improvements to investor protection, particularly through transparency and decentralization, they also create new vulnerabilities. Whether they truly enhance protection depends on how effectively the new risks are managed and whether investor-facing safeguards are evolving at a similar pace.  

Final Thoughts: A Win for Crypto ETPs or a Double-Edged Sword? 

The shift toward in-kind redemptions for crypto ETPs is a milestone that could accelerate mainstream adoption. By streamlining how ETFs handle crypto assets, this rule sends a strong signal that regulators are ready to engage with crypto in a more structured way.

However, this development isn’t without risks. In-kind processes demand robust infrastructure, secure custody solutions, and strong operational controls. If these are lacking, the system could become vulnerable to technical failures or manipulation. The success of this model hinges on whether asset managers can deliver secure and transparent execution.

Ultimately, this could be a win for crypto ETPs, but only if the industry gets it right. The long-term success of in-kind redemptions will depend on effective execution, robust infrastructure, and how well ETP policy balances innovation with investor protection and systemic risk management. If poorly handled, this breakthrough could expose cracks in the system rather than strengthen it.

Disclaimer: This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein should be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading or investing in cryptocurrencies carries a considerable risk of financial loss. Always conduct due diligence. 

If you would like to read more articles like this, visit DeFi Planet and follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and CoinMarketCap Community.

Take control of your crypto  portfolio with MARKETS PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics tools.”