rewrite this title Riding the Regulatory Wave: Building a Communications Stack That Won’t Break – UC Today

Communications platforms are no longer just productivity tools. They are essential to the day-to-day operations of modern organizations, supporting workflows that are often critical not only for efficiency but for safety and compliance.  

From emergency alerts in hospitals, manufacturing, and public safety agencies, to financial approvals in banks or regulatory reporting in government agencies, reliable communications are the backbone of operational continuity. 

“Take a step back and ask: what do I need from a business perspective?” says Martin Bitzinger, Senior Vice President of Product Management at Mitel.  

“Start with your requirements, then layer on the regulatory and security needs.” 

By focusing on business-critical workflows first, organizations ensure that compliance and security measures are not just a box-ticking exercise but enhance operations rather than slowing them down.  

For example, a hospital cannot afford for its paging or alerting system to fail even for a few minutes, and a bank cannot risk losing critical approval data because communications platforms were implemented without considering regulatory requirements.  

Understanding these priorities allows IT leaders to balance risk, compliance, and operational needs from the start. 

Understanding Risk and Regulatory Requirements 

Regulations are accelerating on both sides of the Atlantic. In Europe, the AI Act, updates to GDPR, NIS2, and sector-specific regulations are raising the bar for organizations, while in the United States, state-level privacy and cybersecurity laws are creating a patchwork that organizations must navigate.  

Not all communications carry the same regulatory burden. Routine internal messaging or collaboration might be low-risk, whereas communications that involve personal data, medical information, financial approvals, or emergency notifications are highly regulated. 

“Regulation is one aspect,” Bitzinger notes. “But these rules are designed to protect organizations and their critical workflows – not just tick boxes.” 

Mapping workflows against applicable regulations allows organizations to prioritize controls, focusing effort where it has the greatest impact.  

This approach avoids over-engineering low-risk systems while ensuring that high-risk workflows are protected.  

For instance, sensitive communications such as patient consultations or financial approvals may require on-premises or private cloud handling, end-to-end encryption, audit trails, and strict access controls, whereas general collaboration platforms can operate in public cloud environments with less regulatory scrutiny. 

Organizations that fail to properly assess and map these risks are not just opening themselves to fines or penalties; they also increase the likelihood of operational failures, data breaches, and reputational damage. 

Hybrid Architectures: Flexibility, Control, and Resilience 

One of the most practical ways to balance operational requirements with regulatory and security demands is through hybrid communications architectures. These combine cloud, private cloud, and on-premises deployments to deliver flexibility, control, and resilience. 

“Hybrid gives you flexibility,” Bitzinger explains.  

“You can combine different deployment models, create redundancy, and maintain control over critical systems – without sacrificing cloud innovation.” 

For example, a multinational organization might maintain its core voice and emergency alerting systems on-site or in a private cloud to ensure local survivability, while using public cloud platforms for global collaboration. This approach mitigates risk in case of cloud outages, network disruptions, or regional failures. 

Beyond regulatory compliance, hybrid architectures also enhance resilience. Single cloud deployments, no matter how robust, remain vulnerable to DNS failures, large-scale outages, or human error.  

Hybrid models create redundancy across platforms and geographies, ensuring that communication workflows continue even under extreme circumstances. This kind of operational continuity is becoming a core expectation of regulators, especially for sectors that fall under the definition of critical infrastructure. 

Planning for Change and Embedding Compliance 

Regulations are constantly evolving, and organizations cannot rely on static systems. Attempting to build a “perfect” solution for every future law is both costly and impractical. Instead, organizations need adaptable systems that can evolve with regulatory requirements while still maintaining operational integrity. 

“Don’t overreact,” Bitzinger advises. “Plan carefully, understand your business, and evolve what you already have. A complete redesign is rarely realistic.” 

Embedding compliance and security into daily operations ensures that regulatory obligations are not treated as an afterthought. 

Automated monitoring, reporting, and policy enforcement reduce human error, improve visibility, and allow organizations to demonstrate ongoing compliance to regulators.  

For instance, financial institutions can automatically log communications related to approvals, ensuring both transparency and accountability. Hospitals can ensure that patient data shared across systems is fully auditable and encrypted, meeting strict GDPR or HIPAA requirements. 

Hybrid deployments make it easier to implement these measures because they provide flexibility in where and how workloads are handled. Sensitive workflows can remain tightly controlled, while less sensitive systems can benefit from cloud scale and innovation. Over time, this layered approach builds a communications stack that is not only compliant but also resilient, secure, and adaptable to changing business needs and regulatory environments. 

Staying Ahead in a Regulatory World 

Regulatory waves are not slowing down. AI, privacy, and cybersecurity rules are accelerating across the EU and US, and organizations that fail to adapt risk fines, operational disruption, and reputational damage. Communications infrastructure has become a strategic lever, central to both compliance and operational resilience. 

By combining workflow-aligned planning, hybrid deployments, and embedded compliance, organizations can ride the regulatory wave rather than being swept away by it. Hybrid communications architectures allow them to maintain control, secure sensitive data, and ensure continuity across regions and jurisdictions. 

“Hybrid enables organizations to meet regulatory requirements without sacrificing innovation,” Bitzinger concludes.  

“It’s not just about surviving new rules – it’s about building a future-ready communications stack that can adapt as regulations evolve.” 

In a world of growing regulatory complexity, communications platforms are no longer optional. They are strategic assets, critical to resilience, security, and compliance. Organizations that plan carefully, adopt hybrid architectures, and embed compliance into daily operations can stay ahead of the regulatory curve while maintaining operational control and protecting their most sensitive information.