Helium Mobile: Sign up (even for the FREE plan) & get $10 in Cloud Points with code GRAHAM: https://app.heliummobile.com/o6WA/xlueg7ye | Let’s talk about Trump’s 50-year mortgage and what this means for the housing market – Enjoy! Add me on Instagram: GPStephan
GET MY WEEKLY EMAIL MARKET RECAP NEWSLETTER: http://grahamstephan.com/newsletter
THE ORIGIN OF THE 30-YEAR MORTGAGE
The 30-year mortgage was created in the 1940s to help finance new construction after WW2. By the late 1950s, it became the standard across the housing market, designed to help families build long-term equity while keeping payments manageable. Today, more than 90% of buyers choose the 30-year term because it offers fixed monthly payments, predictable costs, and flexibility that fits most incomes and lifestyles.
HOW MORTGAGE PAYMENTS ARE STRUCTURED
Every fixed-rate mortgage payment is split into two parts: principal and interest. In the beginning, nearly all your payment goes toward interest since you still owe almost the full loan amount. Over time, as your balance decreases, the portion applied to principal grows and the portion to interest shrinks. This gradual shift is why early homeownership builds equity slowly — the first decade is mostly just paying the bank. Given that the average homeowner sells after 12.3 years, most people barely make a dent in their principal before restarting the process with a new loan.
THE 50-YEAR MORTGAGE CONCEPT
Recently, talk of a 50-year mortgage resurfaced after Donald Trump suggested extending loan terms to make homes more “affordable.” Even large developers like Pulte Homes hinted at exploring the idea. The pitch sounds appealing: stretch out payments, lower the monthly cost, buy more house – but mathematically, it falls apart. Extending a loan from 30 to 50 years barely changes affordability.
THE MATH NO ONE MENTIONS
Going from a 15-year to a 30-year mortgage boosts affordability by about 34%. But going from a 30-year to a 50-year only improves it by around 8%. Worse, longer loans come with higher interest rates to compensate lenders for the additional risk. If 30-year loans average 6.125% and 15-year loans average 5.375%, a realistic 50-year term could hit 7%. That means on a $500,000 loan, your monthly payment might actually be higher than the 30-year option. Even if rates somehow matched, your savings would only be about $368 per month (hardly worth staying in debt for an extra two decades).
WHY INVESTORS WOULD HATE IT
Mortgage rates track the 10-year Treasury yield because most people sell or refinance within a decade. That makes 30-year mortgages easy to bundle and sell to investors, who get repaid sooner. But a 50-year mortgage traps capital for half a century. Investors face decades of interest-rate risk, and borrowers would build almost no equity for years. For example, on a $500,000 50-year mortgage, after 12 years you’d have paid off only about $32,000 of principal. If the market dips just 6%, your equity could vanish completely, a huge systemic risk for both banks and homeowners.
THE REGULATORY WALL
By law, a “qualified mortgage” cannot exceed a 30-year term. Anything longer becomes “non-qualified,” meaning the lender loses many legal protections if a borrower defaults. That makes it nearly impossible to offer 50-year loans at competitive rates unless Congress rewrites mortgage law. Even then, banks would only do so if the government subsidized the risk, effectively making taxpayers backstop 50-year debt.
WHY IT WON’T WORK
The 50-year mortgage would add almost no meaningful affordability, dramatically increase lifetime interest, and trap homeowners in decades of debt while providing virtually zero equity growth. It introduces massive risk for banks, investors, and borrowers alike. The only way it could exist is as a niche developer-backed product with assumable terms, meaning you could inherit your parents’ mortgage when they pass away. Otherwise, it’s just political theater.
REAL SOLUTIONS TO HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
Instead of stretching loans to absurd lengths, the focus should be on unlocking more inventory. Increasing the capital gains exclusion for home sales to $1 million (and indexing it to inflation) would motivate more sellers. Allowing homeowners to carry their existing mortgage to a new home would ease “rate lock-in.” Expanding the mortgage interest deduction cap from $750,000 to $1.5 million would also help buyers in high-cost areas.
For business inquiries, you can reach me at grahamstephanbusiness@gmail.com
*Some of the links and other products that appear on this video are from companies which Graham Stephan will earn an affiliate commission or referral bonus. Graham Stephan is part of an affiliate network and receives compensation for sending traffic to partner sites. The content in this video is accurate as of the posting date. Some of the offers mentioned may no longer be available. This is not investment advice.
source
