rewrite this title Markets Wake Up to Geopolitical Risk: Oil, Hormuz and the Haven Trade

Analyst Weekly, March 2, 2026

Oil, Hormuz, And The “Haven-First” Trade

Recent geopolitical escalation in the Middle East has shifted market focus back to energy security and supply. Crude rose to a seven-month high, adding a fresh risk premium to a market that, until recently, had been leaning toward oversupply.

Risk Premium vs. Physical Disruption

About 20% of global seaborne crude and LNG transits the Strait of Hormuz. Qatar alone accounts for approximately 20% of global LNG supply, all of which depends on passage through the strait.

Escalation models suggest that a sustained impairment of Hormuz could push oil materially higher, potentially toward $90 to $100 and, in more severe cases, beyond. That is not the base case, but it is now part of the distribution of outcomes.

The Transmission Chain Markets Are Trading

We think that the appropriate way to frame the current situation is around the continuity of oil supply.

Markets try to determine whether this is:

a pricing problem: a temporary geopolitical risk premium, or
a quantity problem: a sustained disruption that impairs delivered energy supply.

That distinction determines how the shock transmits through asset classes.

Scenario 1. Oil supply remains broadly functional

Even with elevated security risk and higher insurance costs, the market can treat the episode as a temporary risk premium. In that world:

crude can spike but struggles to sustain much above recent ranges unless inventories begin drawing materially,
the inflation impulse is limited and mostly short-lived,
rate markets revert to being driven by growth and policy rather than energy shocks,
equities typically absorb the hit and stabilize, particularly if energy strength offsets part of the broader index impact.

To put it more simply, if barrels keep moving, the market can normalize the shock.

Scenario 2. Oil supply is materially impaired

Once transit slows meaningfully, through persistent delays, war-clause cancellations, or credible mine risk, the shock becomes macro-relevant because it changes delivered supply, not just sentiment. In that world:

crude can reprice quickly into the $80 to $100 range and remain elevated,
inflation expectations widen as energy feeds into transport, production costs, and consumer prices,
rate volatility rises because the curve faces a tug-of-war between safe-haven demand and inflation repricing,
equity risk premia expand: higher discount rates and weaker demand expectations pressure multiples, while sector dispersion increases sharply.

Investment Takeaway: The key distinction is that markets can usually adapt to higher prices: they can discount them, hedge them, and pass them through gradually. What markets struggle to price is uncertainty over continuity of supply and timing of delivery. That uncertainty raises volatility, widens risk premia, and forces investors to pay for hedges across assets. That is why the market is watching energy supply indicators closely, because it tells you whether this remains a tradable premium or becomes a supply constraint that changes the macro path.

Asset Class Implications

A balanced approach requires assessing both regimes.

Equities: Broad equity indices face cross-currents:

Energy and defensive sectors such as utilities and real assets tend to outperform when oil rises.

Airlines, travel, and consumer discretionary sectors face margin pressure from higher fuel costs and weaker demand.

Growth and technology become more sensitive to inflation-driven rate repricing, particularly if real yields move higher.

Investment Takeaway: Valuations were already elevated and positioning not overly defensive prior to this escalation, which may increase sensitivity to sustained oil strength. We therefore think that a balanced allocation approach, whether via diversified multi-asset exposure or disciplined sector positioning, becomes more important in periods of elevated dispersion.

Energy: Energy equities are the most direct beneficiaries of sustained crude strength. Above roughly $80 oil, operating leverage improves meaningfully and free cash flow visibility strengthens. In a disruption scenario, integrated majors and upstream producers tend to outperform broader indices. Even in a temporary premium environment, energy exposure can act as a partial hedge within equity portfolios.

Defense: Periods of elevated geopolitical risk often translate into improved medium-term visibility for defense spending. While near-term performance can be volatile, structurally higher security budgets tend to support the sector over time. Allocation here is typically about diversification within equities rather than tactical trading.

Gold and Inflation Hedges: If crude sustains above the mid-$80s, inflation expectations are likely to widen. Gold and broader commodity exposure can serve as partial hedges against both inflation repricing and geopolitical volatility. They are not perfect offsets, but they can reduce portfolio sensitivity to inflation shocks in a supply disruption regime.

Bonds and Rates: In a temporary risk-premium scenario, sovereign bonds often benefit from haven demand, with yields declining as investors reduce equity exposure. However, in a sustained supply disruption scenario, the relationship becomes more complex. Higher energy prices widen breakevens and can push long-end yields higher, even as growth expectations soften. The result may be curve steepening and increased rate volatility. Investors should recognize that duration may not function as a straightforward hedge if inflation expectations begin to reprice materially.

Investment Takeaway: The broader point is that portfolio construction should reflect probabilities, not certainties. If supply continuity is preserved, volatility may prove transitory and selective risk-taking will be rewarded. If disruption becomes sustained, energy exposure, inflation hedges, and careful duration management become increasingly important.

For investors, the response should be measured rather than reactive:

Monitor crude levels: mid-$80s may remain a macro pivot.

Watch inflation expectations and curve dynamics.

Maintain selective exposure to energy and inflation beneficiaries.

Avoid over-concentration in fuel-sensitive sectors.

Preserve diversification through multi-asset or thematic portfolios.

Crypto: Consolidation Under Geo-Macro Constraints 

Recent Middle East headlines triggered a short-term selloff in bitcoin, followed by a quick rebound as immediate escalation fears moderated. The situation remains fluid, but the market reaction was measured and technical rather than systemic. This episode reinforces a broader point as bitcoin reacts to global uncertainty, but it is still primarily driven by liquidity and positioning dynamics rather than safe-haven flows.

Bitcoin continues to behave as a highly liquid macro asset. It absorbs shocks efficiently, but it does not yet trade as digital gold in institutional portfolios.

The larger constraint remains monetary conditions. While recent CPI data showed some cooling, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge (PCE) has not confirmed a decisive disinflation trend. Without that confirmation, policy flexibility remains limited and liquidity conditions stay relatively tight. In this regime, upside momentum tends to require clear flow support.

Institutional flows, particularly via ETFs, remain the dominant short-term driver. Inflows provide constructive support; outflows accelerate weakness. Institutionalization has strengthened crypto’s structural foundation, but it has also increased its correlation with broader risk appetite.

Ethereum reflects a similar dual dynamic. Structurally, it remains central to tokenization, staking, and on-chain financial infrastructure. However, on-chain activity has moderated compared to prior expansion phases. The long-term narrative is intact; the short-term cycle is still consolidating.

Technically, the market remains range-bound within clearly defined levels. For bitcoin, the $60,000–62,000 area continues to act as structural support. A sustained break below would open the $55,000–58,000 range. On the upside, $72,000–75,000 remains the key resistance band. A confirmed break above that zone, supported by strong ETF inflows, would materially improve the medium-term outlook.

For ethereum, $1,900 acts as near-term support, while sustained acceptance above $2,100–2,200 would signal improving momentum.

These levels define whether the current phase remains consolidation or transitions toward renewed expansion.

Deep drawdowns rarely resolve quickly. Historically, they require time, stabilization in flows, and gradual rebuilding of confidence. The present environment aligns with that pattern.

The primary short-term variable is liquidity, not structural fragility. Inflation trends need clearer confirmation. Policy needs room to shift. Institutional flows need to turn consistently constructive.

In the meantime, preparation matters more than prediction.

Investors should focus on monitoring ETF flows and derivatives positioning, scale exposure rather than adopt binary allocations, and separate structural conviction from tactical execution.

The market is not in distress. It is digesting prior excess under tighter macro conditions.

A durable upside phase will likely require confirmed disinflation, improved liquidity conditions, and sustained capital inflows. Until then, discipline remains the edge.

Geopolitics Drives Oil Prices – Next Targets in Focus

The geopolitical escalation in the Middle East is likely to give oil prices a strong start to the week. However, the technical picture had already shifted in favor of the bulls over the past three months. A further rise therefore comes as no surprise, only the pace of the move might catch the market off guard.

In December, Brent turned higher just above the 2025 low at $58.23. This was followed by a move above the 20-week moving average and a break of several resistance levels, including the lower highs from the previous downtrend. Most recently, the price closed at $73.17, around 25 percent above the December low.

On the upside, four potential target zones are now coming into focus: $77.94, $81.79, $87.68, and $91.64.

Traders looking to position in the direction of the trend currently have two options: either ride the momentum of the ongoing upswing or wait for a pullback. Markets often revisit former breakout levels. In the short term, these areas lie around $71.92, $70.52, and $66.39.

Brent, weekly chart. Source: eToro

AI Power Struggle: Nvidia Dominates, Broadcom Counters

For many investors, Broadcom represents the next key to understanding where the AI story is headed. The company is set to report earnings on Wednesday after the close. While Nvidia provides the computing power, effectively the “brain”, an AI data center consists of far more than just chips. Broadcom supplies a large part of the surrounding infrastructure, the “nervous system” that enables computing power to scale efficiently.

Will the Support Zone Hold?

Technically, Broadcom is trading around 21% below its all-time high and is therefore officially in bear market territory. Since the end of 2021, larger corrections have ranged between 30% and 45%. The stock is currently trading within a fair value gap between $310 and $323, which may serve as an initial support zone. If this level holds, a move back toward the record high would be possible. A sustained break below could open the door to the  $260 area.

Broadcom, weekly chart. Source: eToro

This communication is for information and education purposes only and should not be taken as investment advice, a personal recommendation, or an offer of, or solicitation to buy or sell, any financial instruments. This material has been prepared without taking into account any particular recipient’s investment objectives or financial situation and has not been prepared in accordance with the legal and regulatory requirements to promote independent research. Any references to past or future performance of a financial instrument, index or a packaged investment product are not, and should not be taken as, a reliable indicator of future results. eToro makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication.